- Provides a comprehensive view of controversies and consensus in determination of death by neurological criteria
- Helps to understand underlying issues and conceptual, medical and legal basis for the debates
- Appeals to a multidisciplinary audience and written by diverse group of authors
This book presents principal controversies over the determination of death by neurologic criteria (“brain death”).
The editors and authors are exceedingly well-versed in this subject and are on the forefront of the current debates. The content is divided in the following disciplinary: philosophical (conceptual), medical, scientific, legal, religious, and ethical/social. Many of the topics feature pro-con debates, allowing readers to consider the merits of the arguments and decide their own position.
The work is targeted to clinicians and nurses who treat critically ill and dying patients, organ donation personnel, ethicists and philosophers who write on end-of-life issues, and lawyers and legislative/public policy professionals who draft laws on death determination. It identifies and debates the essential controversies currently raging in academic and public policy circles over the medical adequacy, scientific validity, and conceptual coherence of death determination by neurologic criteria.
Whether a professional or a student, the reader will be given a comprehensive course in the most pressing controversies and areas of consensus in the determination of death by neurologic criteria.
Contents Overview- Conceptual Issues
- Medical Issues
- Scientific Issues
- Legal Issues
- Religious Issues
- Ethical and Social Issues
